Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2007 Two new species of orthocerid cephalopods from the Carboniferous Panching Limestone, West Malaysia
SHUJI NIKO, Masatoshi Sone, Mohd Shafeea Leman
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two new species of orthocerid cephalopods from the Bashkirian (Late Carboniferous) Panching Limestone in Pahang, West Malaysia are described. They are an orthoceratid Kionoceras panchingense and a pseudorthoceratid Dolorthoceras malaysiense. The detailed internal structure of K. panchingense is documented, this being the first time that the internal structure of a Carboniferous species of Kionoceras is revealed. A species which was previously reported as Hesperoceras cf. laudoni is reexamined, and is revised as D. malaysiense sp. nov. It shows the closest affinity with D. circulare Miller, 1931 of northern Kashmir. Species of Kionoceras and Dolorthoceras are recorded in the Carboniferous of Southeast Asia for the first time.

Introduction

The Carboniferous Panching Limestone, from which the present orthocerid specimens were recovered, is a 600 m sequence and crops out as a narrow, north-northeast to south-southwest trending zone in Pahang, West Malaysia (Figure 1; Metcalfe et al., 1980). It was deposited in a shallow marine environment of the East Malaya Terrane. Among the highly diverse and rich fossil faunas (e.g., Muir-Wood, 1948; Metcalfe et al., 1980; Fontaine et al., 2003), conodonts provide the most reliable age determination for the limestone. The index conodont Declinognathodus noduliferus (Ellison and Graves, 1941) is present in the Panching Limestone (see Igo and Koike, 1968; Metcalfe, 1980); this species' first appearance defines the base of the Bashkirian (lowest Upper Carboniferous), that is, the Mid-Carboniferous Boundary, in the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP; Lane et al., 1999). On the basis of the specimens examined, we propose the two new species, Kionoceras panchingense and Dolorthoceras malaysiense as the first described cephalopods from the Panching Limestone, and the first Carboniferous representatives of these genera in Southeast Asia.

Figure 1.

Locality map of the study area in West Malaysia showing limestone hills, Bukit Tenggek and Bukit Sagu, that have yielded orthocerid cephalopods.

i1342-8144-11-4-331-f01.gif

Systematic paleontology

Order Orthocerida Kuhn, 1940

Superfamily Orthoceratoidea M'Coy, 1844

Family Orthoceratidae M'Coy, 1844

Subfamily Kionoceratinae Hyatt in Zittel, 1900

Genus Kionoceras Hyatt, 1884

Type species.—Orthoceras doricum Barrande, 1868.

Kionoceras panchingense sp. nov. Figure 2

Figure 2.

Kionoceras panchingense sp. nov., holotype, UMUT PM29436. 1. Dorsal(?) view, ×1. 2. Septal view, venter down(?), weakly deformed, ×1. 3. Partial enlargement to show surface ornamentation, ×5. 4. Longitudinal polished section, venter on right(?), × 1.2. 5, 6. Partial enlargements to show siphuncular structure, ×10.

i1342-8144-11-4-331-f02.gif

Diagnosis.—Large species of Kionoceras with gradual shell expansion and probably circular cross section; longitudinal ridges of surface ornament are weak and numerous, 0.5 to 0.8 mm in their shallowly concave interspace width; siphuncular position is nearly central; septal necks long, 2.0–2.6 mm in length, usually orthochoanitic.

Description.—An imperfect and weakly deformed specimen available for study has a large-sized, non-annulated orthoconic phragmocone with gradual shell expansion; approximate angle of shell expansion is 4°; cross section of the available shell is probably circular, reconstructed shell diameter near apical end attains approximately 40 mm. Shell surface ornamented by longitudinal ridges and transverse lirae; longitudinal ridges are weak for Kionoceras, numerous and separated by shallowly concave interspaces, that range from 0.5 to 0.8 mm in width; a very weak longitudinal ridge commonly occurs in each interspace; transverse lirae rarely form narrow but relatively deep salients; no hyponomic sinus detected; constriction not developed in internal mold. Sutures straight and transverse; septa relatively deep, slightly thickening towards ventral(?) side, attaining a thickness of 0.8 mm; cameral length moderate for the genus; width/length ratios of camerae are approximately 2.5. Siphuncle nearly central in position, empty; septal necks usually orthochoanitic, but indicate faintly suborthochoanitic appearance in dorsal(?) side, long, 2.0–2.6 mm in length; connecting rings cylindrical with narrow adnation area on dorsal(?) surface of septa; diameters of connecting rings range from 3.0 to 3.1 mm. Cameral deposits absent in preserved portion.

Material examined.—The holotype, UMUT PM29436, is approximately 110 mm in length. Repository of the specimen is in the paleontological collections of the University Museum of the University of Tokyo, Japan.

Occurrence.—The specimen was collected from an isolated limestone hill named Bukit Tenggek, located approximately 30 km north-west of Kuantan. Detailed geologic information concerning this locality is given by Metcalfe et al. (1980).

Etymology.—The specific name is derived from the Panching Limestone.

Discussion.—Late Paleozoic records of Kionoceras are relatively few. About ten Carboniferous species of the genus have been documented from Western Europe (Fleming, 1828; Haughton, 1859; Koninck, 1880; Foord, 1897; Demanet, 1941; Histon, 1998), the Urals (Shimanskiy, 1968), and North America (Miller and Garner, 1953; Gordon, 1957). Internal structure of these species is essentially unknown, thus direct comparisons with Kionoceras panchingense sp. nov. are difficult. However, this new species can be diagnosed by the combination of its external morphology, including gross shell shape, shell size, and character of surface ornamentation.

Superfamily Pseudorthoceratoidea Flower and Caster, 1935

Family Pseudorthoceratidae Flower and Caster, 1935

Subfamily Spyroceratinae Shimizu and Obata, 1935

Genus Dolorthoceras Miller, 1931

Type species.—Dolorthoceras circulare Miller, 1931.

Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov. Figure 3

Figure 3.

Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov., holotype, A420. 1. Cross sectional view of adoral end, venter down, ×1.5. 2. Lateral view, venter on right, ×1.5. 3. Longitudinal thin section, venter on left, ×5. 4. Partial enlargements to show ventral septal neck, ×50. 5. Partial enlargements to show dorsal septal neck, ×50. 6. Partial enlargement to show siphuncular structure; note modifications of the last septum, camera and connecting ring, ×14.

i1342-8144-11-4-331-f03.gif
  • Hesperoceras cf. laudoni Miller and Youngquist, 1947; Metcalfe et al., 1980, pl. 3, figs. 19, 20.

  • Diagnosis.—Species of Dolorthoceras with circular cross section of shell and smooth shell surface; usual camerae relatively short; siphuncle subcentral with siphuncular position ratio (see the description for its determination) of approximately 0.4.

    Description.—An imperfect specimen consisting of phragmocone and apical position of body chamber available for study, nonannulated, orthoconic with gradual expansion indicating an approximately 4° angle; cross section is circular, diameter attains 16 mm at body chamber; no apical shell preserved. Shell surface smooth, lacks distinct ornamentation. Sutures straight and faintly oblique, toward apex on dorsum with an approximately 3° angle from rectangular plane to shell axis; septal curvature moderate; usual cameral length relatively short for the genus, indicating 6.2–6.5 in width/length ratio; the last camera very short with width/length ratio of 11.2. Siphuncle subcentral, shifting ventrally in position; siphuncular position ratio (distance of central axis of septal foramen from ventral shell per corresponding shell diameter) is approximately 0.4; except for dorsal septal neck of the last septum that has a cyrtochoanitic appearance, septal necks are usually suborthochoanitic; length of septal necks ranges from 0.33 to 0.40 mm; except for the last connecting ring which has a nearly circular profile, usually they are fusiform with weak inflation; maximum diameter/length ratios of usual siphuncular segments are approximately 0.7; adnation area very narrow on ventral surface of septa and narrow on dorsal counterpart. Cameral deposits not preserved; endosiphuncular deposits not well preserved, but may be parietal.

    Material examined.—The holotype, A420, is approximately 53 mm in length. Repository of the specimen is in the Department of Geology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Occurrence.—The specimen was collected from an isolated limestone hill named Bukit Sagu, located approximately 3 km south-southwest of Bukit Tenggek (see the occurrence of the preceding species).

    Etymology.—The specific name is derived from Malaysia.

    Discussion.—The available specimen was previously examined by Metcalfe et al. (1980) as Hesperoceras cf. laudoni. However, it is here designated as the holotype of Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov. We consider it as belonging to Dolorthoceras rather than Hesperoceras (Miller and Youngquist, 1947), because of the circular shell cross section and the subcentral siphuncular position. Hesperoceras laudoni Miller and Youngquist (1947, p. 116, pl. 27, figs. 1–3), the type species of the genus, from the Lower Carboniferous of North America, is characterized by having a shell with a subrectangular cross section and a central siphuncular position, unlike the new species from West Malaysia. In addition, the new species possesses a non-annulated shell with suborthochoanitic septal necks, weakly inflated connecting rings, and very narrow to narrow adnation area. This justifies its generic assignment to Dolorthoceras.

    Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov. shows the closest affinity with D. circulare Miller (1931, p. 420–422, figs. 1, 2) from the Upper Carboniferous of northern Kashmir, Central Asia. However, the new species has a less eccentric siphuncle, that is, the siphuncular position ratio is approximately 0.4 in D. malaysiense, whereas it is approximately 0.3 in D. circulare.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Ian Metcalfe, who generously provided enlightening discussions about geologic aspects of the Panching Limestone. We are also grateful to C.P. Lee for the loan of Specimen A420, which is now the holotype of Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov. Helpful reviews of the original manuscript were given by K. Histon and H. Igo. M. Sone is supported by a postdoctoral research fellowship of Niigata University.

    References

    1.

    J. Barrande 1868. Systême Silurien du Centre de la Bohême. Premiére Partie: Recherches Paléontologiques. Volume II. Classe des Mollusques, Ordre des Céphalopodes, 3me Série pls. 245–350, Prague and Paris. Google Scholar

    2.

    F. Demanet 1941. Faune et stratigraphie de l'étage Namurien de la Belgique. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique no. 97p. 1–327. pls. 1–49. Google Scholar

    3.

    S. P. Ellison and R. W. Graves . 1941. Lower Pennsylvanian (Dimple Limestone) conodonts of the Marathon Region, Texas. University of Missouri, School of Mines and Metallurgy, Bulletin, Technical Series vol. 14:p. 1–13. pls. 1–3. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. Fleming 1828. History of British Animals, Exhibiting the Descriptive Characters and Systematical Arrangement of the Genera and Species of Quadrupeds, Birds, Reptiles, Fishes, Mollusca, and Radiata of the United Kingdom; Including the Indigenous, Extirpated, and Extinct Kinds, Together with Periodical and Occasional Visitants 565. p. Bell and Bradfute. Edinburgh James Duncan. London. Google Scholar

    5.

    R. H. Flower and K. E. Caster . 1935. The stratigraphy and paleontology of northeastern Pennsylvania. Part II: Paleontology. Section A: The cephalopod fauna of the Conewango Series of the Upper Devonian in New York and Pennsylvania. Bulletins of American Paleontology vol. 22:p. 199–271. Google Scholar

    6.

    H. Fontaine, B. A. Ibrahim, and D. Vachard . 2003. Carboniferous corals from the Kuantan area, Peninsular Malaysia, and associated microfauna: Peculiar faunas for Southwest Asia and puzzling faunas for stratigraphy. Minerals and Geological Department, Malaysia, Technical Papers vol. 2:p. 69–99. Google Scholar

    7.

    A. H. Foord 1897–1903. Monograph on the Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, London p. 1–234. pls. 1–49. Google Scholar

    8.

    M. Gordon Jr. 1957. Mississippian cephalopods of northern and eastern Alaska. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 283 p. 1–61. pls. 1–6. Google Scholar

    9.

    K. Histon 1998. A revision of A. H. Foord's monograph of Irish Carboniferous nautiloid cephalopods (1897–1901). Part 1. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, London no. 609p. 1–62. pls. 1–7. Google Scholar

    10.

    S. Haughton 1859. On some new Orthocerata from the Carboniferous limestone of neighbourhood of Cork and Clonmel. Journal of the Royal Dublin Society vol. 2:p. 241. pl. 5. Google Scholar

    11.

    A. Hyatt 1883–1884. Genera of fossil cephalopods. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History vol. 22:p. 253–338. Google Scholar

    12.

    H. Igo and T. Koike . 1968. Carboniferous conodonts from Kuantan, Malaya. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia vol. 12:p. 26–30. pl. 3. Google Scholar

    13.

    L. G de Koninck 1880. Faune du calcaire Carbonifère de la Belgique. Deuxième partie. Annales du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique vol. 5:p. 1–133. pls. 32–50. Google Scholar

    14.

    O. Kuhn 1940. Paläozoologie in Tabellen 50. p. Fischer. Jena. Google Scholar

    15.

    H. R. Lane, P. L. Brenckle, J. F. Baesemann, and B. Richards . 1999. The IUGS boundary in the middle of the Carboniferous: Arrow Canyon, Nevada, USA. Episodes vol. 22:p. 272–283. Google Scholar

    16.

    F. M'Coy 1844. A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland 274. p. Privately published. (reissued by Williams and Norgate, London, 1862). Google Scholar

    17.

    I. Metcalfe 1980. Upper Carboniferous conodont faunas of the Panching Limestone, Pahang, West Malaysia. Palaeontology vol. 23:p. 297–314. Google Scholar

    18.

    I. Metcalfe, M. Idris, and J. T. Tan . 1980. Stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Carboniferous sediments in the Panching area, Pahang, West Malaysia. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia vol. 13:p. 1–26. Google Scholar

    19.

    A. K. Miller 1931. Two new genera of Late Paleozoic cephalopods from Central Asia. American Journal of Science, Fifth Series vol. 22:p. 417–425. Google Scholar

    20.

    A. K. Miller and H. F. Garner . 1953. Lower Mississippian cephalopods of Michigan. Part I. Orthoconic nautiloids. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan vol. 10:p. 159–192. pls. 1–3. Google Scholar

    21.

    A. K. Miller and W. Youngquist . 1947. The discovery and significance of a cephalopod fauna in the Mississippian Caballero Formation of New Mexico. Journal of Paleontology vol. 21:p. 113–117. pls. 27, 28. Google Scholar

    22.

    H. M. Muir-Wood 1948. Malayan Lower Carboniferous Fossils and Their Bearing on the Visean Palaeontology of Asia 77–p., pls. 1–10, 16, 17. British Museum (Natural History). London. Appendices by Edwards, W. N., Oakley, K. P., Smith, S. and Stubblefield, C. J., p. 78–102. pls. 10–15. Google Scholar

    23.

    V. N. Shimanskiy 1968. Kamennougolniye Orthoceratida, Oncoceratida, Actinoceratida i Bactritida (Carboniferous Orthoceratida, Oncoceratida, Actinoceratida and Bactritida). Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 117:p. 1–151. pls. 1–20. (in Russian). Google Scholar

    24.

    S. Shimizu and T. Obata . 1935. New genera of Gotlandian and Ordovician nautiloids. Journal of the Shanghai Science Institute, Section 2, Geology, Palaeontology, Mineralogy and Petrology vol. 2:p. 1–10. Google Scholar

    25.

    K. A von Zittel 1900. Textbook of Paleontology translated and edited by C. R. Eastman vol. 1:706. p. Macmillan and Co., Limited. London and New York. Google Scholar
    SHUJI NIKO, Masatoshi Sone, and Mohd Shafeea Leman "Two new species of orthocerid cephalopods from the Carboniferous Panching Limestone, West Malaysia," Paleontological Research 11(4), 331-336, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.2517/1342-8144(2007)11[331:TNSOOC]2.0.CO;2
    Received: 6 March 2007; Accepted: 1 July 2007; Published: 1 December 2007
    KEYWORDS
    Bashkirian (Upper Carboniferous)
    Dolorthoceras malaysiense sp. nov.
    Kionoceras panchingense sp. nov.
    Malaysia
    Orthoceratidae
    Panching Limestone
    Pseudorthoceratidae
    Back to Top